Techniques for issuing interrupts in a data processing system with multiple scopes

ABSTRACT

A technique for handling interrupts in a data processing system includes receiving, by an interrupt routing controller (IRC), an event routing message (ERM) that includes an event source number for a notification source with an unserviced interrupt. In response to receiving the ERM, the IRC builds an event notification message (ENM) based on the event source number. The IRC determines a scope for the ENM based on an event target group (ETG) associated with the event source number. The IRC issues the ENM to an interrupt presentation controller (IPC) at the scope associated with the ETG.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is generally directed to data processing systems and, more specifically, to techniques for issuing interrupts in a data processing system with multiple scopes.

In data processing systems, an interrupt signal (interrupt) is generated to indicate to a processor that an event requires attention. Depending on a priority of an interrupt, a processor may respond by suspending current activities, saving state, and executing a function (i.e., an interrupt handler) to service the event. For example, hardware interrupts may be generated by an input/output (I/O) device, e.g., disk drive controller, a keyboard, a mouse, or other peripheral device. In contrast, software interrupts may be caused either by an exception condition in a processor or a special instruction in an instruction set architecture (ISA) that, when executed, causes an interrupt to be generated. Following interrupt servicing, a processor resumes suspended activities.

An interrupt handler, also known as an interrupt service routine (ISR), is a callback function (e.g., implemented in firmware, an operating system (OS), or a device driver) whose execution is triggered by an interrupt. Interrupt handlers perform various interrupt dependent functions. For example, pressing a key on a computer keyboard or moving a computer mouse triggers interrupts that call respective interrupt handlers to read a key or a mouse position and copy associated information into memory of a computer. In data processing systems, an interrupt controller may be implemented to combine multiple interrupt sources onto one or more processor exception lines, while facilitating the assignment of priority levels to different interrupts.

BRIEF SUMMARY

A technique for handling interrupts in a data processing system includes receiving, by an interrupt routing controller (IRC), an event routing message (ERM) that includes an event source number for a notification source with an unserviced interrupt. In response to receiving the ERM, the IRC builds an event notification message (ENM) based on the event source number. The IRC determines a scope for the ENM based on an event target group (ETG) associated with the event source number. The IRC issues the ENM to an interrupt presentation controller (IPC) at the scope associated with the ETG.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a high-level block diagram of an exemplary data processing system having multiple scopes in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of an exemplary processing unit of the data processing system of FIG. 1 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3A is a diagram of exemplary fields of a conventional event notification message (ENM);

FIG. 3B is a diagram of exemplary fields of a conventional notification rejection message (NRM);

FIG. 3C is a diagram of exemplary fields of a conventional end-of-interrupt (EOI) message;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary conventional interrupt source controller (ISC);

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary conventional interrupt presentation controller (IPC);

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by a conventional ISC to handle interrupts;

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by a conventional IPC to handle interrupts;

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of another exemplary process implemented by a conventional IPC to handle interrupts;

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by a conventional processor core to handle interrupts;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of yet another exemplary process implemented by a conventional IPC to handle interrupts;

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of still another exemplary process implemented by a conventional IPC to handle interrupts;

FIG. 12A is a diagram of exemplary fields of an ENM that is configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 12B is a diagram of an exemplary field of an exemplary escalate message that is configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 12C is a diagram of exemplary fields of an exemplary event routing message (ERM) that is configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 12D is a diagram of exemplary fields of an exemplary event notification scope message (ENSM) that is configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a graph that depicts a relationship between the number of lower-order bits to ignore and virtual processor (VP) threads that may service an associated interrupt according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 14A is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary ISC configured according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 14B is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary interrupt routing controller (IRC) configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 14C is a block diagram that illustrates a memory structure that includes a list of interrupt destination buffer (IDB) chains, per virtual processor thread (VPT) on a priority basis, that include a pointer for each priority level that points to a VPT IDB header that is linked, via a link field in the VPT IDB header, to an intermediate logical server IDB header which is further linked to a global logical server IDB header according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 14D is a block diagram that further illustrates how IDBs are linked via link fields in IDB headers for the memory structure of FIG. 14C;

FIG. 14E is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary scope selector of the IRC of FIG. 14B;

FIG. 15A is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary IPC configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 15B is a block diagram further illustrating additional exemplary fields of an exemplary interrupt context table (ICT) implemented in the IPC of FIG. 15A;

FIG. 16A is a block diagram that illustrates that the IPC of FIG. 15A is configured according to one embodiment of the present disclosure to implement three ICTs, i.e., a hypervisor stack level ICT, an operating systems (OS) stack level ICT, and a user stack level ICT;

FIG. 16B is a block diagram of relevant components of an exemplary selector of the IPC of FIG. 15A;

FIG. 16C is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by an ISC, configured according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 16D is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by an IRC, configured according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 17A is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 17B is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 18A is a flowchart of another exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 18B is a flowchart of yet another exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 18C is a flowchart of still another exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 18D is a flowchart of another exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 19 is a flowchart of still another exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 20 is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 21 is a flowchart of another exemplary process implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts;

FIG. 22 is a flowchart of yet another exemplary process implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts; and

FIG. 23 is a flowchart of an exemplary process implemented by an IPC, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Data processing systems may have various scopes at which an interrupt may be serviced. For example, a data processing system may include a number of different processing nodes, each of which includes a number of processing units. Depending on where virtual processors (VPs) are dispatched within a data processing system, a received interrupt may serviced by: a processing unit that receives the interrupt; a different processing unit within a processing node that includes the processing unit that received the interrupt; or another processing unit within another processing node that does not include the processing unit that received the interrupt. It should be appreciated that broadcasting an event notification message (ENM), in response to a receiving an interrupt, to all processing units within a data processing system is inefficient when a processing unit that received the interrupt is executing a VP that is to be interrupted to service the interrupt. It should also be appreciated that broadcasting an ENM, in response to a receiving an interrupt, to all processing units within a processing node is inefficient when a processing unit that received the interrupt is executing a VP that is to be interrupted to service the interrupt.

According to aspects of the present disclosure, a scope of an ENM is limited to a lower level (e.g., processing unit level or processing node level) to increase efficiency of a data processing system (e.g., by reducing interconnect traffic) when a required scope for an ENM does not correspond to a system level. It should be appreciated that a scope of an ENM may be specified in various manners, e.g., different ENMs can be utilized for different scopes or a field in an ENM may be implemented to specify a scope of the ENM.

With reference now to the figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like and corresponding parts throughout, and in particular with reference to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a high level block diagram depicting an exemplary data processing system 100 whose processing units 104 implement one or more interrupt presentation controllers (IPCs) and multiple interrupt source controllers (ISCs) configured in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. In the depicted embodiment, data processing system 100 is a cache coherent symmetric multiprocessor (SMP) data processing system including multiple processing nodes 102 for processing data and instructions. Processing nodes 102 are coupled to a system interconnect 110 for conveying address, data, and control information. System interconnect 110 may be implemented, for example, as a bused interconnect, a switched interconnect or a hybrid interconnect.

In the depicted embodiment, each processing node 102 is realized as a multi-chip module (MCM) containing four processing units 104 a-104 d, each which may be realized as a respective integrated circuit or chip. The processing units 104 within each processing node 102 are coupled for communication to each other and system interconnect 110 by a local interconnect 114, which, like system interconnect 110, may be implemented, for example, with one or more buses and/or switches. System interconnect 110 and local interconnects 114 together form a system fabric.

Processing units 104 each include a memory controller (not shown) coupled to local interconnect 114 to provide an interface to a respective system memory 108. Data and instructions residing in system memories 108 can generally be accessed, cached, and modified by a processor core in any processing unit 104 of any processing node 102 within data processing system 100. System memories 108 thus form the lowest level of memory storage in the distributed shared memory system of data processing system 100. In alternative embodiments, one or more memory controllers (and system memories 108) can be coupled to system interconnect 110 rather than a local interconnect 114.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that SMP data processing system 100 of FIG. 1 can include many additional non-illustrated components, such as interconnect bridges, non-volatile storage, ports for connection to networks or attached devices, etc. Because such additional components are not necessary for an understanding of the described embodiments, they are not illustrated in FIG. 1 or discussed further herein. It should also be understood, however, that the enhancements described herein are applicable to data processing systems of diverse architectures and are in no way limited to the generalized data processing system architecture illustrated in FIG. 1.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a more detailed block diagram of an exemplary processing unit 104, in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure, is depicted. In the depicted embodiment, each processing unit 104 is an integrated circuit including multiple processor cores 200 for processing instructions and data. In a preferred embodiment, each processor core 200 supports simultaneous multithreading (SMT) and thus is capable of independently executing multiple hardware threads of execution simultaneously.

Each processor core 200 is coupled to an interrupt presentation controller (IPC) 240 and an interrupt routing controller (IRC) 260 via memory I/O bus 210. In one or more embodiments, IPC 240 includes a single interrupt context table (ICT) 242 that maintains various information for physical processor (PP) threads. In one or more other embodiments, a different ICT 242 is implemented for each software stack level that is dispatched on a PP thread (see, for example, FIG. 16A). As is illustrated in FIG. 16A, ICT 242 a is implemented for a hypervisor (Hyp) stack level, ICT 242 b is implemented for an operating system (OS) stack level, and ICT 242 c is implemented for a user stack level. It should be appreciated that an IPC configured according to the present disclosure may implement more or less than three different software stack levels. In one or more embodiments, IPC 240 is also coupled to each processor core 200 via respective exception lines 212, which are utilized to notify each processor core 200 of an associated interrupt for an assigned virtual processor thread. In embodiments in which a different ICT 242 is implemented for each software stack level, different exceptions lines 212 are implemented for each software stack level. IPC 240 is also coupled to I/O controllers 220 via memory I/O bus 210. IPC 240 is configured to receive/send information via memory I/O bus 210 from/to I/O controllers 220 and/or processor cores 200.

Each I/O controller 220 includes a packet decoder 222 and an interrupt source controller (ISC) 224 that includes an event assignment table (EAT) 226, whose values may be set via software (e.g., by a hypervisor). Each I/O controller 220 is coupled to an I/O adapter 230 via an I/O bus 214. A device or devices (not shown), e.g., disk drive, keyboard, mouse, may initiate interrupt generation by I/O controller 220 by signaling I/O adapter 230 to send a packet to packet decoder 222 of I/O controller 220 via I/O bus 214. EAT 226 includes information that I/O controller 220 uses to create event routing messages (ERMs) that are sent to IRC 260 via memory I/O bus 210. IRC 260 is configured to create event notification messages (ENMs) that are sent to: IPC 240 via memory I/O bus 210; an IPC 240 in a different processing unit 104 within processing node 102 via memory I/O bus 210 and local interconnect 114; or an IPC 240 within a different processing unit 104 within a different processing node 102 via memory I/O bus 210, local interconnect 114, and system interconnect 110. While only a single interrupt presentation controller and a single interrupt routing controller are illustrated in FIG. 2, it should be appreciated that a processing unit configured according to the present disclosure may include more than one interrupt presentation controller and more than one interrupt routing controller.

With reference now to FIG. 3A, a structure of an exemplary conventional event notification message (ENM) 302 is illustrated. ENM 302 includes an ‘event target number’ field (which specifies a physical processor thread number), an ‘event source number’ field, and an ‘event priority’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an event notification message. A value in the ‘event target number’ field identifies a physical processor thread that is to be interrupted to facilitate servicing of an associated interrupt by an associated processor core. A value in the ‘event source number’ field identifies a notification source that generated the interrupt. A value in the ‘event priority’ field identifies a priority level of the interrupt. ENM 302 is generated and issued by a conventional ISC 424 (see FIG. 4) to indicate that a notification source (identified by the ‘event source number’ field) has generated the interrupt and is received and processed by a conventional IPC 540 (see FIG. 5).

With reference now to FIG. 3B, a structure of an exemplary conventional notification rejection message (NRM) 304 is illustrated. NRM 304 includes an ‘event source number’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as a notification rejection message. NRM 304 is generated and issued by IPC 540 (see FIG. 5) and is received and processed by ISC 424 (see FIG. 4) to indicate, to ISC 424, that the requested interrupt was rejected and needs to be reissued. It should be appreciated that a processing unit configured according to the present disclosure may not utilize NRMs as interrupts may be buffered, e.g., within internal memory of IRC 260 or within memory that is external to IRC 260 (but accessible to IRC 260).

With reference now to FIG. 3C, a structure of an exemplary conventional end-of-interrupt (EOI) message 306 is illustrated. EOI message 306 includes an ‘event source number’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an EOI message. EOI message 304 is generated and issued by IPC 540 (see FIG. 5) and sent to ISC 424 (see FIG. 4) to indicate, to ISC 424, that an interrupt requested by a device associated with the event source number has been serviced.

With reference to FIG. 4, relevant components of conventional ISC 424 are illustrated. It should be appreciated that ISC 424 is replaced by ISC 224 in a processing unit configured according to the present disclosure. ISC 424 is included within an I/O controller that also includes a packet decoder 422 that is coupled to an I/O bus 414 (similar to I/O bus 214 of FIG. 2), a message decoder 404 (that is used to decode EOI messages 306 and/or NRMs 304 received via memory I/O bus 410 (similar to memory I/O bus 210 of FIG. 2)), an event assignment table (EAT) 426, and an interrupt message encoder 406 that utilizes appropriate information in EAT 426 to generate ENMs 302 for an interrupt source. Packet decoder 422 is configured to decode packets received via I/O bus 414 and select a finite state machine (FSM) to process a received packet based on an event source number of a source of the packet. As is illustrated, ISC 424 includes an FSM for each row (i.e., S-FSM 0 through S-FSM N) in EAT 426 that is configured to write information into EAT 426 to facilitate building ENMs 302. It should be appreciated that the event source number illustrated in EAT 426 is not a field, but is only used to indicate a row number. For example, source number ‘0’ is assigned to row number ‘0’ of EAT 426, source number ‘1’ is assigned to row number ‘1’ of EAT 426, etc. In EAT 426, each row has an associated ‘event priority’ field and an ‘event target number’ field, whose values are utilized to populate corresponding fields in ENM 302, which is generated by interrupt message encoder 406 when an interrupt is requested by an associated I/O device.

With reference to FIG. 5, relevant components of conventional IPC 540 are illustrated. It should be appreciated that IPC 540 is replaced by IPC 240 in a processing unit configured according to the present disclosure. IPC 540 includes a message decoder 502, a memory mapped I/O (MMIO) unit 504, and a message encoder 506 coupled to memory I/O bus 410. Processor cores communicate with IPC 540 via MMIO unit 504, using MMIO loads and MMIO stores. IPC 540 receives messages from ISC 424 via message decoder 502. IPC 540 generates messages for ISC 424 via message encoder 506. MMIO unit 504 issues a trigger EOI message 507 to message encoder 506 to cause message encoder 506 to generate and send an EOI message 306 on memory I/O bus 410 to ISC 424. Message decoder 502 is coupled to selector 522, which is configured to select an FSM (i.e., one of P-FSM 1 through P-FSM M) based on an event target number associated with a received ENM 302. FSMs of IPC 540 access interrupt context table (ICT) 542 to initiate generation of an exception to a physical processor thread executing on a processor core and to initiate generation of a trigger reject message 505 to message encoder 506, which generates an NRM 304 in response to trigger reject message 505.

It should be appreciated that the physical thread number illustrated in ICT 542 is not a field, but is only used to indicate a row. For example, physical thread number ‘0’ is assigned to row number ‘0’ of ICT 542, physical thread number ‘1’ is assigned to row number ‘1’ of ICT 542, etc. In ICT 542, each row has an associated ‘valid’ field, an ‘operating priority’ field, an ‘assigned’ field, an ‘event source number’ field, and an ‘event priority’ field, whose values are set by FSMs and may be accessed to return values to a processor core in response to a MMIO load.

It should be appreciated that various blocks of the processes described herein as being executed by an ISC (both conventionally and per embodiments of the present disclosure) may run simultaneously per row of an associated EAT and that various blocks of the processes described herein as being executed by an IPC (both conventionally and per embodiments of the present disclosure) may run simultaneously per row of an associated ICT. As examples, at least portions of the various processes may be performed by FSM logic associated with a given row of an EAT and/or ICT or an engine may be implemented to perform the various processes while sequencing through all rows of an EAT and/or ICT. It should also be appreciated that processes (see, for example, FIGS. 16C-23) executed by an IRC configured according to the present disclosure may run simultaneously per row of an associated event notification descriptor table (ENDT).

With reference to FIG. 6 an exemplary process 600 is illustrated that is implemented by ISC 424 to handle interrupts. Process 600 may, for example, be initiated in block 602 when ISC 424 receives input via I/O bus 414. Next, in decision block 604, ISC 424 determines whether the received input corresponds to an interrupt trigger (or interrupt trigger pulse). In response to the received input not being an interrupt trigger control loops on block 604. In response to the received input being an interrupt trigger in block 604 control transfers to block 606. In block 606, ISC 424 builds an ENM 302 based on associated information in EAT 426. Next, in block 608, ISC 424 sends ENM 302 to IPC 540 via memory I/O bus 410.

Then, in decision block 610, ISC 424 determines whether a reject message (i.e., an NRM 304) has been received from IPC 540. For example, IPC 540 may generate an NRM 304 in response to a physical processor thread that is designated to be interrupted to service the interrupt having a higher operating priority than an event priority of the interrupt. In response to ISC 424 receiving an NRM 304 for ENM 302 in block 610 control transfers to block 614, where process 600 waits a configurable time period before returning control to block 606 where another ENM 302 is built for the interrupt. In response to ISC 424 not receiving an NRM 304 for ENM 302 in block 610 control transfers to decision block 612. In block 612, ISC 424 determines whether an EOI message 306 has been received from IPC 540. In response to ISC 424 receiving an EOI message 306 for ENM 302 in block 612 control returns to block 604. In response to ISC 424 not receiving an EOI message 306 for ENM 302 in block 612 control returns to block 610.

With reference to FIG. 7 an exemplary process 700 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 540 to handle interrupts. Process 700 may be initiated in block 702 when IPC 540 receives input via memory I/O bus 410. Next, in decision block 704, IPC 540 determines whether an ENM 302 was received. In response to the received input not being an ENM 302 control loops on block 704. In response to the received input being an ENM 302 in block 704 control transfers to decision block 706. In block 706, IPC 540 determines whether a valid bit for a row in ICT 542 that is assigned to an event target number (i.e., physical processor thread) specified in ENM 302 is asserted (i.e., whether the specified physical processor thread is populated and operational, as specified by a valid field of the physical processor thread in ICT 542).

In response to the valid bit not being asserted in block 706 control transfers to block 712, where error processing is initiated, and then returns to block 704. In response to the valid bit being asserted in block 706 control transfers to decision block 708. In block 708, IPC 540 determines whether a pending interrupt is already assigned to a physical processor thread associated with the event source number (by examining a value of an ‘assigned’ field of the specified physical processor thread in ICT 542). In response to a pending interrupt not already being assigned to the specified physical processor thread in block 708 control transfers to block 714. In block 714 IPC 540 asserts the ‘assigned’ field, and sets the ‘event source number’ field, and the ‘event priority’ field for the specified physical processor thread based on values included in ENM 302. Following block 714 control returns to block 704.

In response to a pending interrupt already being assigned to the physical processor thread in block 708 control transfers to decision block 710. In block 710 IPC 540 determines whether an event priority of a new interrupt, as specified in the ‘event priority’ field of ENM 302, is greater than an event priority of an already pending interrupt, as specified in the ‘event priority’ field of the physical processor thread in ICT 542. In response to the event priority of the new interrupt not being greater than the event priority of the pending interrupt control transfers from block 710 to block 716. In block 716 IPC 540 issues an NRM 304 to the event source number specified in ENM 302 (i.e., the source associated with the new interrupt). Following block 716 control returns to block 704.

In response to the event priority of the new interrupt being greater than the event priority of the pending interrupt control transfers from block 710 to block 718. In block 718 IPC 540 issues an NRM 304 to the event source number specified in ICT 542 (i.e., the source associated with the pending interrupt). Next, in block 720, IPC 540 modifies the event source number and the event priority, as specified in ENM 302, for the physical processor thread in ICT 542. Following block 720 control returns to block 704.

With reference to FIG. 8 an exemplary process 800 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 540 to assert/deassert exception lines based on associated ‘assigned’ fields being asserted (indicating a pending interrupt) and an event priority for the pending interrupt being greater than (or less than or equal to) an operating priority of a physical processor thread that is to be interrupted to facilitate servicing the interrupt by an associated processor core. Process 800 may be periodically initiated in block 802 by IPC 540 to determine whether exceptions lines to respective processor cores require assertion or deassertion. Next, in decision block 804, IPC 540 determines whether an assigned field for each row in ICT 542 is asserted (i.e., true), which indicates that an interrupt is pending for an associated physical processor thread.

In response to an ‘assigned’ field not being asserted in a row of ICT 542 control transfers from block 804 to block 810. In block 810 IPC 540 deasserts an exception line associated with a row that was recently unassigned or maintains the exception line in a deasserted state for a row that is unassigned, but not recently unassigned. Following block 810 control returns to block 804. In response to an assigned field being asserted in a row of ICT 542 control transfers from block 804 to decision block 806. In block 806, IPC 540 determines whether an event priority of a pending interrupt is greater than an operating priority of an associated physical processor thread.

In response to the event priority of a pending interrupt not being greater than an operating priority of an associated physical processor thread in block 806 control transfers to block 810, where associated exception lines remain deasserted. In response to the event priority of a pending interrupt being greater than an operating priority of an associated physical processor thread in block 806 control transfers to block 808, where associated exception lines are asserted. Following block 808 control returns to block 804.

With reference to FIG. 9, an exemplary process 900 that is implemented by a processor core to handle interrupts is illustrated. It should be appreciated that each processor core maintains an exception enable bit (e.g., in an internal processor register) for each associated exception line. Process 900 may be periodically executed by a processor core to determine whether a physical processor thread should be interrupted to facilitate executing, by the processor core, an interrupt handler to service an interrupt. Process 900 is initiated in block 902 at which point control transfers to decision block 904. In block 904 the processor core determine whether both an exception line and an exception enable bit are asserted (i.e., true). A processor core masks interrupts by deasserting the exception enable bit.

In response to the exception line and/or the associated exception enable bit not being asserted control loops on block 904. In response to both the exception line and the associated exception enable bit being asserted control transfers from block 904 to block 906. In block 906 the processor core deasserts (resets) the exception enable bit (to prevent subsequent interrupts from interrupting the current interrupt). Next, in block 908, the processor core changes control flow to an appropriate interrupt handler. Then, in block 910, the processor core acknowledges the pending interrupt by issuing a MMIO load to IPC 540. Next, in block 912, the processor core executes a program that is registered to handle interrupts from the source (specified by a value in the ‘event source number’ field).

Next, in block 914, following completion of the program, the processor core issues a MMIO store to IPC 540 to signal an EOI. Then, in block 916, the processor core, resets the operating priority in the row in ICT 542 that is associated with the physical processor thread to a pre-interrupt value. Next, in block 918, the processor core atomically asserts the exception enable bit and returns control flow to a program that was interrupted to service the interrupt. Following block 918 control returns to block 904.

With reference to FIG. 10, an exemplary process 1000 that is implemented by IPC 540 to handle interrupts is illustrated. Process 1000 may be periodically executed by IPC 540 to determine whether IPC 540 has received a communication (e.g., MMIO load or a MMIO store) from a processor core with respect to a pending interrupt. Process 1000 is initiated in block 1002 at which point control transfers to decision block 1004. In block 1004 IPC 540 determines whether a MMIO load has been received at an interrupt acknowledge address.

In response to a MMIO load not being received at the interrupt acknowledge address control loops on block 1004. In response to a MMIO load being received at the interrupt acknowledge address control transfers to block 1006. In block 1006 IPC 540 atomically sets an operating priority to the pending interrupt priority and resets the assigned field for the interrupt in ICT 542, and returns the pending interrupt source number as response data to the MMIO load. From block 1006 control returns to block 1004.

With reference to FIG. 11, an exemplary process 1100 that is implemented by IPC 540, to handle changes in operating priority for a physical thread when an interrupt is currently pending, is illustrated. Process 1100 may be periodically executed by IPC 540 to determine whether IPC 540 has received a communication (e.g., a MMIO load or a MMIO store) from a processor core with respect to a pending interrupt. Process 1100 is initiated in block 1102 at which point control transfers to decision block 1104. In block 1104 IPC 540 determines whether a MMIO store (to change an operating priority) has been received at an operating priority address.

In response to a MMIO store not being received at the operating priority address control loops on block 1104. In response to a MMIO load being received at the operating priority address control transfers from block 1104 to block 1106. In block 1106, IPC 540 sets an operating priority for each row in ICT 542 per data associated with the MMIO store. Next, in decision block 1108, IPC 540 determines whether the operating priority is less than the pending event priority for each row in ICT 542. In response to the operating priority being less than a pending event priority control transfers from block 1108 to block 1104 (as a pending interrupt does not require rejection). In response to the operating priority not being less than a pending event priority control transfers from block 1108 to block 1109 where the row assigned bit is deasserted (reset) to indicate an interrupt is no longer pending and the event priority field is reset (e.g., to a lowest value) to indicate that an interrupt is no longer pending. Next, in block 1110, IPC 540 issues a reject message to a notification source associated with the interrupt that was previously pending. From block 1110 control returns to block 1104.

According to various aspects of the present disclosure, ENMs indicate a scope (e.g., processing unit level, processing node level, or system level) at which the ENM is to be issued in an effort to improve efficiency of an associated data processing system.

With reference to FIG. 12A, a structure of an exemplary event notification message (ENM) 1202, that is configured according to the present disclosure, is illustrated. ENM 1202 includes a ‘process ID’ field, a ‘level’ field, an ‘event target number’ field, a ‘number of bits to ignore’ field, an ‘escalate event number’ field, an ‘event path number’ field, and an ‘event priority’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an event notification message. A value in the ‘process ID’ field (when a user level interrupt is specified) identifies a user process to interrupt (e.g., thirty-two different user processes may be specified). A value in the ‘level’ field specifies whether the interrupt is a user level interrupt, an OS level interrupt, or a hypervisor level interrupt. A value in the ‘event target number’ field identifies a virtual processor (VP) thread that is designated to be interrupted to facilitate the servicing of an associated interrupt by an associated processor core. In one or more embodiments, upper bits (e.g., the upper four bits) of the value in the ‘event target number’ field specify an event target group (ETG) for the VP thread. A value in the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field specifies the number of lower-order bits to ignore in the ‘event target number’ when determining which VP threads may potentially be interrupted to service the interrupt. A value in the ‘escalate event number’ field identifies an event source number that is to be utilized in the event a VP thread in a specified software stack (specified in the ‘level’ field) is not dispatched and an escalate message is received at an interrupt source controller. A value in the ‘event path number’ field identifies an event path number (i.e., an interrupt destination buffer (IDB)). A value in the ‘event priority’ field identifies a priority level of the interrupt.

ENM 1202 is generated by interrupt routing controller (IRC) 260 at a required scope. ENM 1202 is configured according to the present disclosure (see FIG. 14B) and issued to an interrupt presentation controller (IPC) 240 that is configured according to the present disclosure (see FIGS. 15A and 15B) to indicate that a notification source has generated an interrupt or that an interrupt is to be escalated to a higher level. It should be appreciated that ENM 1202 is similar to ENM 302, with some exceptions being that ENM 1202 includes an additional field that specifies a ‘process ID’ for a user level interrupt, an additional field that specifies a ‘level’ (i.e., a user level, an OS level, or a hypervisor level) of an interrupt, an additional field that specifies a ‘number of bits to ignore’ that is used when selecting a VP thread to interrupt, an additional field that specifies an ‘event escalate number’, and an ‘event path number’ field (as contrasted with an ‘event source number’ field), and that the ‘event target number’ field identifies a VP thread and an ETG, as contrasted with a physical processor thread.

For example, assuming that sixteen VP threads are implemented (i.e., VP threads 0000 through 1111) the number of VP threads that may be considered for interruption may be specified as a single VP thread or all sixteen VP threads depending on a value specified in the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field. As one example, assuming that VP thread eight, i.e., ‘1000’, is specified in the ‘event target number’ field and that three is specified in the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field, then eight VP threads (i.e., ‘1000’ through ‘1111’) may be considered for interruption to service an associated interrupt. As another example, assuming that VP thread eight, i.e., ‘1000’, is specified in the ‘event target number’ field and that zero is specified in the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field, then only VP thread eight (i.e., ‘1000’) may be considered for interruption to service an associated interrupt. It should be appreciated that various fields mentioned above with respect to ENM 1202 may be optional depending on the embodiment.

With reference to FIG. 12B, a structure of an exemplary escalate message 1204, that is configured according to the present disclosure, is illustrated. Escalate message 1204 includes an ‘escalate event number’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an escalate message. The escalate message is sourced by IPC 240 and received by ISC 224. In response to receiving the escalate message, ISC 224 builds a new event routing message (ERM) 1206 that uses a value provided in the ‘escalate event number’ field as the event source number for the new ERM 1206.

With reference to FIG. 12C, a structure of an exemplary ERM 1206, that is configured according to the present disclosure, is illustrated. ERM 1206 includes an ‘event path number’ field and an ‘event source number’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an event routing message. ERM 1206 is sourced by ISC 224 and received by IRC 260. In response to receiving ERM 1206, IRC 260 builds a new ENM 1202 that uses a value provided in the ‘event path number’ field as the event path number for the new ENM 1202.

With reference to FIG. 12D, a structure of an exemplary event notification scope message (ENSM) 1208, that is configured according to the present disclosure, is illustrated. ENSM 1208 includes an ‘event target group valid vector’ field and an ‘IPC ID’ field, as well as a field (not shown) that identifies the message as an event notification scope message. A value in the ‘event target group valid vector’ field specifies which ETGs are valid for an IPC 240 specified by a value in the ‘IPC ID’ field. ENSM 1208 is sourced by IPC 240 when a change occurs to an ETG associated with the IPC 240 and is received by all other IPCs 240 in data processing system 100, such that each IPC 240 in data processing system 100 is made aware of the ETGs of all other IPCs 240 in data processing system 100. In response to receiving ENSM 1208, each IPC 240 updates a row (specified by the value in the ‘IPC ID’ field) in an associated scope selector table (SST) according to the values in the ‘event target group valid vector’ field. As is discussed in further detail below, each IRC 260 in data processing system 100 utilizes the information in the SST to determine a scope at which an ENM 1202 is to be issued.

With reference to FIG. 13, a graph 1300 is illustrated that depicts a relationship between the number of (lower-order) bits to ignore and VP threads that may potentially service an associated interrupt for a data processing system that deploys up to sixteen VP threads, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. It should be appreciated that the disclosed techniques are applicable to data processing systems that deploy more or less than sixteen VP threads. As is illustrated in graph 1300, when the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is four all sixteen VP threads are potentially available to service an associated interrupt. When the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is three, eight VP threads are potentially available to service an associated interrupt. When the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is two, four VP threads are potentially available to service an associated interrupt. When the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is one, two VP threads are potentially available to service an associated interrupt. When the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is zero, one VP thread is potentially available to service an associated interrupt. In general, where the ‘number of bits to ignore’ is ‘n’ bits, a specified virtual processor thread and 2^(n)−1 other virtual processor threads may be potentially interrupted.

With reference to FIG. 14A, relevant components of ISC 224 of FIG. 2, which is configured according to the present disclosure, are further illustrated. As previously mentioned, I/O controller 220 includes packet decoder 222, which is coupled to I/O bus 214 and ISC 224. ISC 224 includes a message decoder 1404 (that is used to decode conventional EOI messages 306 and escalate messages 1204 received via memory I/O bus 210), EAT 226, and an interrupt message encoder 1406 that utilizes appropriate information in EAT 226 to generate ERMs 1206 for a notification source. Packet decoder 222 is configured to decode packets received via I/O bus 214 and select a finite state machine (FSM) to process the received packet based on an event source number for a notification source of the packet.

As is illustrated, ISC 224 includes an FSM for each row (i.e., S-FSM 0 through S-FSM N) in EAT 226 that is configured to maintain information in EAT 226 to facilitate building ERMs 1206. In one embodiment, a different set of FSMs (not shown) is implemented to handle the generation of ERMs 1206 in response to escalate messages 1204. It should be appreciated that the event source number illustrated in EAT 226 is not a field, but is only used to indicate a row number. For example, source number ‘0’ is assigned to row number ‘0’ of EAT 226, source number ‘1’ is assigned to row number ‘1’ of EAT 226, etc. In EAT 226, each row has an associated ‘event path number’ field, whose values may be utilized to populate corresponding fields in an ERM 1206, which is generated by interrupt message encoder 1406 when an interrupt is requested by an associated I/O device.

With reference to FIG. 14B, relevant components of IRC 260 of FIG. 2, which is configured according to the present disclosure, are further illustrated. IRC 260 includes a message decoder 1464, a message encoder 1468, and an interrupt routing finite state machine (FSM) 1466, all of which are coupled to memory I/O bus 210. Message encoder 1468 includes a scope selector 1469 that is configured to determine a scope (e.g., processing unit level, processing node level, or system level) for an ENM 1202 based on values in an associated column of a scope selector table (SST) 1471 (see FIG. 14E) of scope selector 1469. Message decoder 1464 decodes ERMs 1406 received via memory I/O bus 210. An output of message decoder 1464 is coupled to an input of selector 1462 and an input of FSM 1466. IRC 260 also includes an event notification descriptor table (ENDT) 1460 that is coupled to selector 1462 and FSM 1466. Selector 1462 selects an appropriate row in ENDT 1460 responsive to output from message decoder 1464. FSM 1466, which is coupled to message encoder 1468, provides information selected from ENDT 1460 to message encoder 1468 to facilitate the generation of ENMs 1202 at a scope determined by scope selector 1469. While SST 1471 is illustrated as being included within scope selector 1469 it should be appreciated that SST 1471 may be located at any location that is accessible to scope selector 1469.

It should be appreciated that each row in ENDT 1460 corresponds to an event path number. For example, event path number ‘0’ is assigned to row number ‘0’ of ENDT 1460, event path number ‘1’ is assigned to row number ‘1’ of ENDT 1460, etc. In ENDT 1460, each row has an associated address (‘Addr’) field, a generation (‘Gen’) field, an offset counter (‘Offset Ctr’) field, a ‘size’ field, an ‘event priority’ field, an ‘event target number’ field, a ‘number of bits to ignore’ field, a ‘level’ field, a ‘process ID’ field, and an ‘escalate event number’ field. Values in fields of ENDT 1460 may be utilized to populate corresponding fields in an ENM 1202, which is generated by message encoder 1468 responsive to an ERM 1406 when an interrupt is requested by an associated I/O device. Values in the ‘Addy’ field, the ‘Gen’ field, the ‘Offset Ctr’ field, and the ‘size’ field of ENDT 1460 are used to insert information into associated interrupt destination buffers (IDBs).

With reference to FIG. 14C, an exemplary operating system (OS) image IDB memory structure 1470 is illustrated that includes a virtual processor thread (VPT) list of IDB chains 1472 (i.e., per VPT on a priority basis). Elements (or entries) of IDB chains 1472 include a pointer for each priority level of each VPT that points to a respective VPT IDB header 1474 that is linked, via a link field, to an intermediate logical server IDB header 1476, which is further linked to a global logical server IDB header 1478 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. Memory structure 1470 also includes an OS image interrupt notification path list 1479 that maintains IDB header pointers with associated priorities for each event path number.

With reference to FIG. 14D, a block diagram 1480 further illustrates how a specific VPT IDB 1482 is linked to another IDB 1488 via a link field in specific VPT IDB header 1474 a. As is illustrated, specific VPT IDB 1482 is linked to IDB 1488 via a pointer (link) in specific VPT IDB header 1474 a that points to IDB header 1476 a. Information in VPT IDB header 1474 a is used to retrieve information from specific VPT IDB 1482. That is, VPT IDB header 1474 a includes an ‘address’ field that indicates an address of specific VPT IDB 1482, a generation ‘G’ field that provides a single bit that indicates whether a circular buffer that is formed from specific VPT IDB 1482 has been completely traversed (i.e., has wrapped), a ‘size’ field that indicates a size of specific VPT IDB 1482, and an ‘offset count’ field that indicates what location in specific VPT IDB 1482 is currently being accessed. As is illustrated, each element (or entry) in specific VPT IDB 1482 includes a generation ‘G’ field and an ‘event source number’ field. It should be appreciated that multiple different event source numbers may be associated with a single event path number. Similarly, information in IDB header 1476 a is used to retrieve information from IDB 1488, which may, for example, correspond to a group IDB.

With reference to FIG. 14E, scope selector 1469 is further illustrated as including a scope selector table (SST) 1471. SST 1471 includes a row for each IPC 240 in data processing system 100 and a column for each event target group (ETG) implemented in data processing system 100. As one example, SST 1471 may have sixteen rows and sixteen columns. As previously alluded to, when a change occurs in a column of SST 1471 that change is issued system wide by an associated IPC 240 via an ENSM 1208. Broadcasting changes in SST 1471 throughout data processing system 100 ensures that ENMs 1202 are issued by each IRC 260 at an appropriate scope, which may reduce traffic on interconnects 114 and 110.

With reference to FIGS. 15A and 15B, relevant components of IPC 240 are further illustrated. IPC 240 includes a message decoder 1502, a memory mapped I/O (MMIO) unit 1504, and a message encoder 1506 all of which are coupled to memory I/O bus 210. Processor cores 200 communicate with IPC 240 via MMIO unit 1504, using MMIO loads and MMIO stores. IPC 240 generates messages (e.g., for ISC 224 and for other IPCs 240 in system 100) via message encoder 1506. MMIO unit 1504 issues a trigger EOI message 1507 to message encoder 1506 to cause message encoder 1506 to generate and send an EOI message 306 on memory I/O bus 210 to ISC 224. IPC 240 also includes an ETG counters unit 1505 that is coupled to the ‘valid’ and ‘VP #’ fields of ICT 242. A counter for an associated ETG is incremented when a valid bit is asserted for the ETG and is decremented when the valid bit is deasserted for the ETG. ETG counters unit 1505 generates an ENSM trigger 1510 to message encoder 1506 to trigger issuance of an ENSM 1208. Each IPC 240 is configured to issue ENSMs 1208 system wide to notify other IPCs 240 of changes in associated ETGs to enable each IPC 240 in system 100 to track ETGs for all other IPCs 240 in their local SST 1471. IPC 240 receives messages from IRC 260 via message decoder 1502. Message decoder 1502 is coupled to selector 1508, which is configured to select an FSM (i.e., one of P-FSM 1 through P-FSM M) for message processing based on an event path number associated with a received ENM 1202. FSMs of IPC 240 access interrupt context table (ICT) 242 to initiate generation of an exception to a physical thread executing on a processor core 200 and to generate a trigger escalate message 1509 to message encoder 1506, which generates an escalate message 1204 in response to trigger escalate message 1509.

It should be appreciated that the physical processor thread number illustrated in ICT 242 is not a field, but is only used to indicate a row. For example, physical (processor) thread number ‘0’ is assigned to row number ‘0’ of ICT 242, physical thread number ‘1’ is assigned to row number ‘1’ of ICT 242, etc. In ICT 242, each row is illustrated as having an associated ‘valid’ field, virtual processor number (‘VP #’) field, ‘process ID’ field (used for user level interrupts), an ‘operating priority’ field, an interrupt acknowledge count (‘IAC’) field, an ‘escalate event number’ field, an ‘assigned’ field, an ‘event path number’ field, an ‘event priority’ field, and a ‘preferred’ field, at least some of whose values may be retrieved by a processor core using a MMIO load in response to an exception line being asserted by IPC 240.

The ‘valid’ field indicates whether a processor is installed and powered on and whether a VP is dispatched and operating on an associated physical processor thread. The ‘VP #’ field specifies a number of the VP that is dispatched on the associated physical processor thread, as well as an associated ETG. In one embodiment, the lower four bits of the ‘VP #’ field specify the VP number and the upper four bits of the ‘VP #’ field specify the ETG. The ‘process ID’ field specifies a process ID for a user level interrupt. The ‘operating priority’ field specifies a priority level of a program currently running on the associated physical processor thread. The ‘IAC’ field specifies a current IAC that is used to determine whether an associated VP thread has been interrupted too often. In one or more embodiments, the IAC is decremented when the associated VP thread is interrupted and may be periodically incremented while the associated VP thread is dispatched to implement a rate instrument. The ‘escalate event number’ field (which may, for example, be setup by OS or hypervisor software) specifies an event source number that is used to escalate an interrupt to a higher software level when a VP thread associated with a current software stack level is interrupted too frequently. It should be appreciated that additional similar VP threads may also be dispatched to service a workload when a given VP thread is interrupted too frequently. The ‘preferred’ field may be utilized by software to indicate a preferred VP thread to interrupt.

With reference to FIG. 16A, ICT 242 is further illustrated as including three different ICTs (i.e., a hypervisor stack level ICT 242 a, an OS stack level ICT 242 b, and a user stack level ICT 242 c), each of which has different associated exception lines 212 a, 212 b, and 212 c routed to processor cores 200. In at least one embodiment, only ICT 242 c includes a ‘process ID’ field.

With reference to FIG. 16B, relevant components of selector 1508 of IPC 240 of FIG. 15A are further illustrated, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. As is depicted, selector 1508 include comparators (CMP 0 through CMP M), i.e., one for each row in ICT 242, that compare an ‘event target number’, a ‘process ID’ for user level interrupts, a ‘level’, and ‘number of bits to ignore’ provided in ENM 1202 and ‘valid’, ‘process ID’ for user level interrupts, and ‘VP #’ values stored in respective rows of an appropriate one of ICTs 242 a, 242 b, or 242 c. Outputs of the comparators are provided to a ‘no hits’ unit 1652 which determines whether any VP threads are available to be interrupted (when the interrupt is a user level interrupt the process IDs are also compared). In the event zero VP threads are available to be interrupted, ‘no hits’ unit 1652 issues trigger escalate message 1509) to message encoder 1506 (see FIG. 15A). In the event more than one VP thread is available to be interrupted, ‘secondary selection’ unit 1654 determines which VP thread should be interrupted and issues an appropriate interrupt trigger to trigger an interrupt on an associated physical processor thread.

‘Secondary selection’ unit 1654 may implement various secondary selection criteria in determining which available VP thread to select for interruption. For example, ‘secondary selection’ unit 1654 may select a VP thread to interrupt based on ‘event priority’ relative to ‘operating priority’, least recently used (LRU), and/or random, etc. According to one aspect of the present disclosure, ‘preferred’ bits 1511 from appropriate rows (sourced from a ‘preferred’ field of ICT 242) are utilized by secondary selection unit 1654 in determining which of one of multiple VP threads is selected to be interrupted to service the interrupt. It should be appreciated that the various selection criteria may be implemented in series to select a single VP thread when multiple VP threads are still available after a given selection process. In one or more embodiments, when no VP thread is available to be interrupted based on an ‘event priority’ of the interrupt being less than an ‘operating priority’ of all of the multiple VP threads, IPC 240 issues escalate message 1204 to ISC 224 using an appropriate row of ICT 242 as a source for the escalate event number.

With reference to FIG. 16C an exemplary process 1600 is illustrated that is implemented by ISC 224 to handle interrupts. Process 1600 may, for example, be initiated in block 1602 when ISC 224 receives input via I/O bus 214 or via memory I/O bus 210. Next, in decision block 1604, ISC 224 determines whether the received input corresponds to an interrupt trigger (or interrupt trigger pulse) or an escalate message 1204. In response to the received input not corresponding to an interrupt trigger or escalate message 1204 control loops on block 1604. In response to the received input being an interrupt trigger or escalate message 1204 in block 1604 control transfers to block 1606.

In block 1606, ISC 224 builds an ERM 1206 based on associated information in EAT 226. It should be appreciated that when the received input is an escalate message 1204 with an associated escalate event number, the escalate event number is utilized as the event source number in building a new ERM 1206. Next, in block 1608, ISC 224 issues ERM 1206 to IRC 260 via memory I/O bus 210. Then, in block 1612, ISC 224 determines whether an EOI message 306 has been received from IPC 240. In response to ISC 224 not receiving an EOI message 306 in block 1612 control loops on block 1612. In response to ISC 224 receiving an EOI message 306 in block 1612 control returns to block 1604.

With reference to FIG. 16D an exemplary process 1650 is illustrated that is implemented by IRC 260 to handle interrupts. Process 1650 may, for example, be initiated in block 1652 when IRC 260 receives input via memory I/O bus 210. Next, in decision block 1654, IRC 260 determines whether the received input corresponds to an event routing message (ERM) 1206. In response to the received input not corresponding to an ERM 1206 control loops on block 1654. In response to the received input being an ERM 1206 in block 1654 control transfers to block 1656. In block 1656, IRC 260 selects a row in event notification descriptor table (ENDT) 1460 per a value of the ‘event path number’ field of ERM 1206. Next, in block 1658, IRC 260 stores a generation bit and event source number (from ENDT 1460) in an interrupt destination buffer (IDB) associated with the event path number (i.e., at an address and offset count specified by the address ‘Addy’ field and offset counter ‘Offset Ctr’ field of ENDT 1460). As one example, IDBs may be allocated in main memory or another memory associated with IRC 260. The generation bit is used to track whether an associated IDB, which in one embodiment is implemented as a circular buffer, has been completely traversed.

Then, in block 1660, IRC 260 increments the offset counter for the IDB modulo the length of the IDB (size field of ENDT 1460), i.e., to point to a next entry in the IDB, in ENDT 1460. Then, in decision block 1662, IRC 260 determines whether the offset counter has wrapped. In response to the offset counter wrapping in block 1662 control transfers to block 1664. In block 1664, IRC 260 changes the polarity of the IDB generation bit in ENDT 1460. Next, in block 1666, IRC 260 builds an event notification message (ENM) 1202 based on associated information in ENDT 1460. Then, in block 1667, IRC 260 determines an ETG for ENM 1202 using an ETG portion of the VP # field and determines a scope for ENM 1202 based on entries in an ETG appropriate column of SST 1471.

In response to the offset counter not wrapping in block 1662 control transfers directly to block 1666. Following block 1666 control transfers to block 1668, where IRC 260 issues ENM 1202 to one or more IPCs 240 at a scope determined by scope selector 1469. In one or more embodiments, in deriving a scope for ENM 1202 scope selector 1469 accesses a column in SST 1471 for the ETG specified in ENM 1202 and then utilizes the smallest scope necessary to reach all IPCs 240 that are indicated to have at least one valid VP for the ETG. If the ETG is only valid for an associated IPC 240, ENM 1202 is only issued at a chip scope (i.e., a processing unit 104 level). On the other hand, if the ETG is valid for at least one IPC 240 outside of an associated chip that is also included within an associated processing node, ENM 1202 is issued at a processing node scope (i.e., at a processing node 102 level). Finally, if the ETG is valid for at least one IPC 240 outside of an associated processing node, ENM 1202 is transmitted at a system scope (i.e., to all processing nodes 102 within data processing system 100). Next, control transfers from block 1668 to block 1654.

With reference to FIG. 17A an exemplary process 1700 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 to handle interrupts. It should be appreciated that IPC 240 handles event notification messages differently from how IPC 540 handles event notification messages (see FIG. 7). Process 1700 is initiated in block 1701 when IPC 240 receives input via memory I/O bus 210. Next, in decision block 1702, IPC 240 determines whether an ENM 1202 was received. It should be appreciated that ISC 224 operates differently from ISC 424 (see FIG. 6) in that ISC 224 builds ERMs 1206 (as contrasted with ENMs 302) that are sent to IRC 260, and IRC 260 builds an ENM 1202 (responsive to an ERM 1206) that is sent to IPC 240. In contrast to ENM 302, ENM 1202 includes an additional ‘process ID’ field, an additional ‘level’ field, an additional ‘number of bits to ignore’ field, an ‘escalate event number’ field, an ‘event path number’ field replaces the ‘event source number’ field, and the ‘event target number’ field provides a virtual processor thread number instead of a physical processor thread number. In response to the received input not corresponding to an ENM 1202 control loops on block 1702. In response to the received input corresponding to an ENM 1202 in block 1702 control transfers to block 1703.

In block 1703, IPC 240 compares the ‘event target number’ from ENM 1202 with all valid VP numbers, ignoring the number of lower-order bits specified (in the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field) by ENM 1202. Next, in decision block 1704, IPC 240 determines whether the ‘level’ field indicates that the interrupt is a user level interrupt. In response to the interrupt being a user level interrupt control transfers from block 1704 to block 1706. In block 1706 IPC 240 compares the ‘process ID’ of ENM 1202 with ‘process IDs’ of rows in ICT 242 c with matching valid VP numbers. From block 1706 control transfers to decision block 1708. In response to the interrupt not being a user level interrupt in block 1704 control transfers directly to block 1708.

In block 1708 IPC 240 determines whether a hit occurred for at least one VP thread. In response to no hits (i.e., no VP threads being available to be interrupted due to no VP thread being valid that meets the VP selection criteria (i.e., specified in the ‘event target number’ field and the ‘number of bits to ignore’ field) with the specified process ID for a user level interrupt) occurring in block 1708 control transfers to block 1709, where IPC 240 issues an escalate message 1204 (to escalate the interrupt to a next higher software stack level, assuming a higher level is available) with an associated escalate event number (EEN), sourced by IRC 260 in ENM 1202. From block 1709 control returns to block 1702. It should be appreciated that various techniques may be employed to ensure that an associated interrupt that is rejected is eventually serviced. In response to at least one hit occurring in block 1708 control transfers to decision block 1712, where IPC 240 determines whether there are any hits that do not have a pending interrupt already assigned.

In response to IPC 240 determining that there is at least one hit that does not already have a pending interrupt assigned in block 1712 control transfers to block 1716. In block 1716, IPC 240 selects (e.g., based on ‘preferred’ bits 1511 from appropriate rows (sourced from a ‘preferred’ field of ICT 242) and may also utilize event priority’ relative to ‘operating priority’, least recently used (LRU), and/or random, etc. in the event that multiple ‘preferred’ bits 1511 are asserted) a row in ICT 242 to trigger an interrupt. Next, in block 1718, IPC 240 asserts an ‘assigned’ field (to indicate an interrupt is pending), and sets an ‘event path number’ field and an ‘event priority’ field of the selected row per ENM 1202. Following block 1718 control returns to block 1702. In response to IPC 240 determining that there are no hits that do not already have a pending interrupt assigned in block 1712 control transfers to decision block 1714. In block 1714, IPC 240 determines whether an interrupt priority (i.e., the event priority) of ENM 1202 is greater than an operating priority of any row with a hit that has a pending interrupt.

In response to the interrupt priority not being greater than an operating priority of any row with a hit that has a pending interrupt control transfers from block 1714 to block 1715, where IPC 240 issues an escalate message 1204 with an associated EEN sourced from an appropriate row or rows of an appropriate ICT 242. From block 1715 control then transfers to block 1702. In response to the interrupt priority being greater than an operating priority of at least one row with a hit that has a pending interrupt control transfers from block 1714 to block 1720. In block 1720, IPC 240 selects (e.g., based on ‘preferred’ bits 1511 from appropriate rows (sourced from a ‘preferred’ field of ICT 242) and may also utilize event priority’ relative to ‘operating priority’, least recently used (LRU), and/or random, etc. in the event that multiple ‘preferred’ bits 1511 are asserted) a row in ICT 242 to trigger an interrupt. From block 1720 control transfers to block 1718 and then to block 1702.

With reference to FIG. 17B an exemplary process 1750 is illustrated that is implemented (for example, by executing a software routine) by a processor core 200 to handle interrupts. Process 1750 is initiated in block 1752 in response to IPC 240 signaling an interrupt (i.e., an event priority of an interrupt being higher than an operating priority of a VPT that is interrupted). Next, in block 1754, processor core 200 issues a MMIO load to an interrupt acknowledge address for IPC 240 and receives, in response to the MMIO load, an event path number. Next, in block 1756, processor core 200 uses the event path number to index a per OS image interrupt notification path list 1479 (see FIG. 14C) and sets a scan priority to a priority associated with the event path number in list 1479. Then, in block 1758, processor core 200 sets an operating priority of the row to one level less than the scan priority. Next, in block 1760, processor core 200 uses the scan priority to index a VP list of interrupt destination buffer (IDB) chains 1472 to retrieve a first IDB (e.g., IDB 1482) in the VP list of IDB chains 1472. Then, in block 1762, for each unprocessed element in the first IDB, processor core 200 executes a program registered to handle the event source number and, upon completion of the registered program, then issues a MMIO store to IPC 240 to signal an EOI.

Next, in decision block 1764, processor core 200 determines whether there is another IDB in the IDB chain. In response to there being another IDB in the IDB chain in block 1764 control transfers to block 1766, where processor core 200 links to the next IDB in the IDB chain. As one example, when there are no more elements in IDB 1482 processor core 200 may access IDB header 1474 a for a link to IDB header 1476 a, which provides an address of a first element in IDB 1488. From block 1766 control returns to block 1762. In response to there not being another IDB in the IDB chain in block 1764 control transfers to decision block 1768, where processor core 200 determines whether there is another interrupt pending in IPC 240. In response to another interrupt being pending in block 1768 control returns to block 1754. In response to another interrupt not being pending in block 1768 control transfers to block 1770. In block 1770 processor core 200 sets the scan priority to the next less favored priority level. Next, in block 1772, processor core 200 determines whether the scan priority is greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority. In response to the scan priority level being greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority level in block 1772 control returns to block 1758. In response to the scan priority level not being greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority level in block 1772 control transfers to block 1774. In block 1774 processor core 200 sets the operating priority of the row to the pre-interrupt value. Next, in block 1776, processor core 200 returns to a suspended program that was interrupted.

With reference to FIG. 18A an exemplary process 1800 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 to handle certain MMIO stores received from a processor core. As one example, a processor core 200 may issue a MMIO store to IPC 240 to invalidate all associated VPs. Process 1800 is initiated in block 1802 when, for example, IPC 240 receives a MMIO store from a given processor core 200. Next, in decision block 1804, IPC 240 determines whether the MMIO store is directed to deasserting (resetting) a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242. In response to the received MMIO store not being directed to deasserting a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242 control loops on block 1804. In response to the received MMIO store being directed to deasserting a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242 control transfers from block 1804 to block 1806. In block 1806 IPC 240 deasserts the valid bit for the row or rows. Next, in block 1808, IPC 240 decrements the ETG count for the row or rows. Following block 1808 control returns to block 1804.

With reference to FIG. 18B an exemplary process 1810 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 to handle certain MMIO stores received from a processor core. For example, a processor core 200 may issue a MMIO store to IPC 240 to validate all associated VPs. Process 1810 is initiated in block 1812 when, for example, IPC 240 receives a MMIO store from a given processor core 200. Next, in decision block 1814, IPC 240 determines whether the MMIO store is directed to asserting (setting) a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242. In response to the received MMIO store not being directed to asserting a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242 control loops on block 1814. In response to the received MMIO store being directed to asserting a valid bit in one or more rows in ICT 242 control transfers from block 1814 to block 1816. In block 1816 IPC 240 asserts the valid bit for the row or rows. Next, in block 1818, IPC 240 increments the ETG count for the row or rows. Following block 1818 control returns to block 1814.

With reference to FIG. 18C an exemplary process 1820 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 to handle a received ENSM 1208. For example, an IPC 240 may broadcast an ENSM 1208 to all other IPCs 240 in response to a local change in SST 1471. Process 1820 may be initiated in block 1822 when, for example, IPC 240 receives a communication. Next, in decision block 1824, IPC 240 determines whether the communication is an ENSM 1208. In response to the received communication not being an ENSM 1208 control loops on block 1824. In response to the received communication being an ENSM 1208 control transfers from block 1824 to block 1826. In block 1826 IPC 240 updates the ETG vector in SST 1471 for the IPC ID indicated in ENSM 1208. Following block 1826 control returns to block 1824.

With reference to FIG. 18D an exemplary process 1830 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 in response to determining a change in a valid bit in a row of ICT 242 is indicated. The process 1830 is initiated in block 1832 in response to IPC 240 receiving a MIMO store from a processor core 200 to change a valid bit in a row in ICT 242. Next, in decision block 1834, IPC 240 determines whether an associated ETG counter should be incremented (i.e., whether the valid bit for the row is being asserted for the ETG specified by the VP # field of the row). In response to IPC 240 determining that the ETG counter should be incremented in block 1834 control transfers to decision block 1844. In block 1844 IPC 240 determines whether the ETG counter is equal to zero. In response to the ETG counter being equal to zero control transfers from block 1844 to block 1846, where IPC 240 builds and issues an ENSM 1208 at a system level, i.e., to all other IPCs 240 in data processing system 100.

Next, in block 1848, IPC 240 increments the ETG counter. In response to the ETG counter not being equal to zero control transfers directly from block 1844 to block 1848. Following block 1848 control returns to block 1834. In response to IPC 240 determining that the ETG counter should not be incremented in block 1834 control transfers to decision block 1836. In block 1836 IPC 240 determines whether the ETG counter should be decremented (i.e., whether the valid bit for the row is being deasserted for the ETG specified by the VP # field of the row). In response to determining that the ETG counter should not be decremented in block 1836 control transfers to block 1834. In response to determining that the ETG counter should be decremented in block 1836 control transfers to block 1838, where IPC 240 decrements the ETG counter. Next, in decision block 1840, IPC 240 determines whether the ETG counter is equal to zero. In response to the ETG counter not being equal to zero control transfers from block 1840 to block 1834. In response to the ETG counter being equal to zero control transfers from block 1840 to block 1842, where IPC 240 builds and issues an ENSM 1208 at a system level, i.e., to all other IPCs 240 in data processing system 100. Following block 1842 control returns to block 1834.

With reference to FIG. 19, an exemplary process 1900 implemented by IPC 240 to handle interrupts is illustrated. It should be appreciated that process 1900 is different than process 1000 implemented by IPC 540 (see FIG. 10). Process 1900 may be periodically executed by IPC 240 to determine whether IPC 240 has received a communication (e.g., a MMIO load or a MMIO store) from a processor core with respect to a pending interrupt. Process 1900 is initiated in block 1902 at which point control transfers to decision block 1904. In block 1904 IPC 240 determines whether a MMIO load has been received at an interrupt acknowledge address. In response to a MMIO load not being received at the interrupt acknowledge address control loops on block 1904. In response to a MMIO load being received at the interrupt acknowledge address control transfers from block 1904 to block 1906. In block 1906 IPC 240 atomically sets an operating priority of the acknowledged interrupt to the pending interrupt event priority and deasserts (resets) the assigned field for the interrupt in ICT 242, and returns the pending interrupt event path number as response data to the MMIO load.

Next, in block 1908, IPC 240 decrements an interrupt acknowledge count (IAC). As previously mentioned, the ‘IAC’ field specifies a current IAC that is used to determine whether an associated VP thread has been interrupted too often. In one or more embodiments, the IAC is decremented when the associated VP thread is interrupted and may be periodically incremented while the associated VP thread is dispatched to implement a rate instrument. Then, in decision block 1910, IPC 240 determines whether the IAC is equal to zero (or alternatively some other threshold level). In response to the IAC not being equal to zero control transfers from block 1910 to block 1904. In response to the IAC being equal to zero control transfers from block 1910 to block 1912. In block 1912 IPC 240 sends an escalate message to ISC 224 per the escalate event number of the row of ICT 242 that is being acknowledged to provide relief for the VPT that has been interrupted too often. From block 1912 control returns to block 1904. While process 1900 is described as being implemented using a count-down approach, it should be appreciated that a similar process may be implemented using a count-up approach. It should also be appreciated that the threshold level and/or the IAC may be periodically modified to implement a rate instrument. As one example, the IAC may be periodically incremented and the threshold level may be maintained at a fixed value to implement a rate instrument.

With reference to FIG. 20 an exemplary process 2000 is illustrated that is implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts. Process 2000 is initiated in block 2002 in response to, for example, processor core 200 determining that a virtual processor thread (VPT) is to be preempted, e.g., such that a higher priority interrupt can be serviced, and that a state of the preempted VPT should be saved. Then, in block 2004, processor core 200 deasserts (resets) an exception enable bit (e.g., maintained in an internal processor register). As previously mentioned, processor core 200 masks interrupts by deasserting an associated exception enable bit. Next, in block 2006, processor core 200 saves architected processor registers in a VP context save area in memory (e.g., system memory 108). Then, in block 2008, processor core 200 issues a MMIO store to IPC 240 to deassert (reset) the VP valid bit. Next, in block 2010, processor core 200 issues one or more MMIO loads to save an entry in ICT 242 in association with the architected processor registers in the VP context save area in memory. Then, control transfers to block 2012 where process 2000 terminates.

With reference to FIG. 21 an exemplary process 2100 is illustrated that is implemented by a processor core, configured according to the present disclosure, to handle interrupts. Process 2100 is initiated in block 2102 in response to, for example, processor core 200 determining that a new virtual processor thread (VPT) requires dispatching. Then, in block 2104, processor core 200 deasserts (resets) an associated exception enable bit (e.g., maintained in an internal processor register). It should be appreciated that processor core 200 masks interrupts by deasserting the exception enable bit. Next, in block 2106, processor core 200 uses one or more MMIO stores to restore an associated entry in ICT 242 from a VP context save area in memory (e.g., system memory 108) and sets a pending interrupt to the most favored VPT interrupt path. Then, in block 2108, processor core 200 issues a MMIO store to assert (set) the VP valid bit in an appropriate entry in IPC 240. Next, in block 2110, processor core 200 issues one or more MMIO stores to restore the architected processor registers from the VP context save area in memory. Then, in block 2112 processor core 200 atomically asserts (sets) the exception enable bit and returns control flow to the interrupted program. Control then transfers from block 2112 to block 2114 where process 2100 terminates.

With reference to FIG. 22 an exemplary process 2200 is illustrated that is implemented by a processor core 200 to handle interrupts. Process 2200 is initiated in block 2202, for example, in response to a lowering in operating priority being indicated. For example, when an operating priority is lowered there may be a pending interrupt that now has a higher event priority (than the lowered operating priority) that should be serviced. Next, in block 2204, processor core 200 sets a scan priority to a current operating priority. Then, in block 2206, processor core 200 sets the operating priority in an associated row to one level less than the scan priority. Next, in block 2208, processor core 200 uses the scan priority to index VP list of IDB chains 1472 to retrieve a first IDB in the IDB chain. Then, in block 2210, for each unprocessed element in the IDB processor core 200 executes the program registered to handle the event source number and issues a MMIO store to IPC 240 to signal an EOI.

Next, in decision block 2212, processor core 200 determines whether there is another IDB in the IDB chain. In response to there being another IDB in the IDB chain in block 2212 control transfers to block 2214, where processor core 200 links to the next IDB in the IDB chain. From block 2214 control returns to block 2210. In response to there not being another IDB in the IDB chain in block 2212 control transfers to decision block 2216, where processor core 200 determines whether there is another interrupt pending in IPC 240. In response to another interrupt being pending in block 2216 control transfers to block 2226, where processor core 200 acknowledges the pending interrupt by issuing a MMIO load to an acknowledge address for IPC 240 and receives an event path number in response. Next, in block 2228, processor core 200 uses the event path number associated with the pending interrupt to index OS image interrupt notification path list 1479 and sets a scan priority to the associated priority. Following block 2228 control returns to block 2206.

In response to another interrupt not being pending in block 2216 control transfers to block 2218. In block 2218 processor core 200 sets the scan priority to the next less favored priority level. Next, in decision block 2220, processor core 200 determines whether the scan priority is greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority. In response to the scan priority level being greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority level in block 2220 control returns to block 2208. In response to the scan priority level not being greater than the pre-interrupt operating priority level in block 2220 control transfers to block 2222. In block 2222 processor core 200 sets operating priority of the row to the pre-interrupt value. Next, in block 2224, processor core 200 returns to a suspended program that was interrupted.

With reference to FIG. 23 an exemplary process 2300 is illustrated that is implemented by IPC 240 to handle a change in operating priority. Process 2300 is initiated in block 2302 when, for example, IPC 240 receives a MMIO operation from a given processor core 200. Next, in decision block 2304, IPC 240 determines whether a MMIO store has been received at an operating priority address. In response to not receiving a MMIO at the operating priority address control loops on block 2304. In response to the receiving MMIO store at the operating priority address control transfers from block 2304 to block 2306. In block 2306 IPC 240 sets the operating priority per data associated with the MMIO store. Following block 2306 control returns to block 2304.

Accordingly, techniques have been disclosed herein that implement interrupt destination buffers (IDBs) to facilitate queuing interrupt information based on event path number, which forecloses the need for implementing reject messages (i.e., NRMs) and may reduce memory I/O bus traffic as a data processing system is scaled-up. It should be appreciated that aspects of the present disclosure may be implemented in a design structure that is tangibly embodied in a computer-readable storage device for designing, manufacturing, or testing an integrated circuit.

In the flow charts above, the methods depicted in the figures may be embodied in a computer-readable medium as one or more design files. In some implementations, certain steps of the methods may be combined, performed simultaneously or in a different order, or perhaps omitted, without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, while the method steps are described and illustrated in a particular sequence, use of a specific sequence of steps is not meant to imply any limitations on the invention. Changes may be made with regards to the sequence of steps without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Use of a particular sequence is therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.”

Any combination of one or more computer-readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer-readable medium may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium. A computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing, but does not include a computer-readable signal medium. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable storage medium would include the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible storage medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular system, device or component thereof to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below, if any, are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of handling interrupts in a data processing system, the method comprising: receiving, by an interrupt routing controller (IRC), an event routing message (ERM), wherein the ERM includes an event source number for a notification source with an unserviced interrupt; in response to receiving the ERM, building, by the IRC, an event notification message (ENM) based on the event source number; determining, by the IRC, a scope for the ENM based on an event target group (ETG) associated with the event source number; and issuing, by the IRC, the ENM to an interrupt presentation controller (IPC) at the scope associated with the ETG.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the scope corresponds to one of a processing unit level and a processing node level.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the scope corresponds to one of a processing unit level, a processing node level, and a data processing system level.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein scope information for the ETG is maintained in a scope selector table that indicates which IPCs in the data processing system are associated with the ETG.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the IPC, an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be asserted; determining, by the IPC, whether an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, building and issuing, by the IPC, an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC; and incrementing, by the IPC, the ETG counter.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the IPC, an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be deasserted; decrementing, by the IPC, an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor; determining, by the IPC, whether the ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; and in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, building and issuing, by the IPC, an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the IPC, an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector and an IPC identifier (ID), and wherein the IPC ID identifies another IPC that issued the ENSM and the ETG vector indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC ID; and updating, by the IPC, a row in an associated scope selector table that corresponds to the IPC ID based on the ETG vector.
 8. A processing unit for a multithreaded data processing system, the processing unit comprising: an interrupt source controller (ISC); an interrupt presentation controller (IPC); and an interrupt routing controller (IRC) coupled to the ISC and the IPC, wherein the IRC is configured to: receive an event routing message (ERM) from the ISC, wherein the ERM includes an event source number for a notification source with an unserviced interrupt; in response to receiving the ERM, build an event notification message (ENM) based on the event source number; determine a scope for the ENM based on an event target group (ETG) associated with the event source number; and issue the ENM to the IPC or another IPC at the scope associated with the ETG.
 9. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein the scope corresponds to one of a processing unit level and a processing node level.
 10. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein the scope corresponds to one of a processing unit level, a processing node level, and a data processing system level.
 11. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein scope information for the ETG is maintained in a scope selector table that indicates which IPCs in the data processing system are associated with the ETG.
 12. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be asserted; determine whether an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, build and issue an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC; and increment the ETG counter.
 13. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be deasserted; decrement an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor; determine whether the ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; and in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, build and issue an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC.
 14. The processing unit of claim 8, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies another IPC that issued the ENSM; and update a row in an associated scope selector table that corresponds to the IPC ID based on the ETG vector.
 15. A design structure tangibly embodied in a computer-readable storage device for designing, manufacturing, or testing an integrated circuit, wherein the design structure is configured to implement: an interrupt source controller (ISC); an interrupt presentation controller (IPC); and an interrupt routing controller (IRC) coupled to the ISC and the IPC, wherein the IRC is configured to: receive an event routing message (ERM) from the ISC, wherein the ERM includes an event source number for a notification source with an unserviced interrupt; in response to receiving the ERM, build an event notification message (ENM) based on the event source number; determine a scope for the ENM based on an event target group (ETG) associated with the event source number; and issue the ENM to the IPC or another IPC at the scope associated with the ETG.
 16. The design structure of claim 15, wherein the scope corresponds to one of a processing unit level, a processing node level, and a data processing system level.
 17. The design structure of claim 15, wherein scope information for the ETG is maintained in a scope selector table that indicates which IPCs in the data processing system are associated with the ETG.
 18. The design structure of claim 15, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be asserted; determine whether an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, build and issue an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC; and increment the ETG counter.
 19. The design structure of claim 15, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an indication that a valid bit for a virtual processor should be deasserted; decrement an ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor; determine whether the ETG counter that is associated with the virtual processor is equal to zero; and in response to the ETG counter being equal to zero, build and issue an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies the IPC.
 20. The design structure of claim 15, wherein the IPC is configured to: receive an event notification scope message (ENSM), wherein the ENSM includes an ETG vector that indicates whether respective ETGs are valid for the IPC and an IPC identifier (ID) that identifies another IPC that issued the ENSM; and update a row in an associated scope selector table that corresponds to the IPC ID based on the ETG vector. 